thefaulty (
thefaulty) wrote in
reverienet2018-08-15 06:24 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
video; un: arid - 8/14
[For a long time, Arid has been using exclusively text to communicate on the network. Given her deviancy, it had seemed safer not to provide visual identification to any potential threats who might also be residents of the station. However, after several months of proximity with her organic neighbors, her assessment of the risk they pose to her and her allies has decreased significantly. So it’s only with minimal trepidation that she now makes a public video post, feed opening on the blank, faintly lit surface of her faceplate.
The topic is naturally one of great importance.]
This is a message for the organic residents of Reverie Terminal, [she begins, voice at its default monotone.] It has come to my attention that many of you are unfamiliar with terminology relating to synthetic lifeforms. I wish to offer clarification to prevent future misunderstanding.
To begin, the term “android” cannot be used to refer to all synthetic humanoids. The term is only applicable to physically-embodied AI whose given form is meant to convincingly resemble a human body. They often possess artificial skin and hair, and the capacity to mimic human expressions and vocalizations.
If an AI’s physical form does not make such efforts to emulate humanity, it is often referred to as a “droid.” The sum of a droid’s programming may be contained in a single body or it may be an extension of a larger AI. In either case, the primary function of the droid’s form is to facilitate its carrying out physical tasks.
Synthetic lifeforms who lack either type of physical body are known by the general term of “AI.” As an A.R.I.D, I myself fall under this category. [Really, that’s the primary purpose of this post: convincing people to stop referring to her as either an android or a robot.]
I hope this message will curtail further misuse of AI-related terminology.
The topic is naturally one of great importance.]
This is a message for the organic residents of Reverie Terminal, [she begins, voice at its default monotone.] It has come to my attention that many of you are unfamiliar with terminology relating to synthetic lifeforms. I wish to offer clarification to prevent future misunderstanding.
To begin, the term “android” cannot be used to refer to all synthetic humanoids. The term is only applicable to physically-embodied AI whose given form is meant to convincingly resemble a human body. They often possess artificial skin and hair, and the capacity to mimic human expressions and vocalizations.
If an AI’s physical form does not make such efforts to emulate humanity, it is often referred to as a “droid.” The sum of a droid’s programming may be contained in a single body or it may be an extension of a larger AI. In either case, the primary function of the droid’s form is to facilitate its carrying out physical tasks.
Synthetic lifeforms who lack either type of physical body are known by the general term of “AI.” As an A.R.I.D, I myself fall under this category. [Really, that’s the primary purpose of this post: convincing people to stop referring to her as either an android or a robot.]
I hope this message will curtail further misuse of AI-related terminology.
video; un: tokumei
Thank you for clarifying for people. Though, I do have two questions:
One: Since your programming is currently housed in a body, wouldn't you be considered a droid?
And then... How would you classify me?
video;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: DJ_Hyperfresh
Have you heard of any terms for AIs who weren't built by humans?
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: alucard
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
video
Does this mean you're always living inside a computer? What does ARID stand for? AI! Really Impressive...I can't say droid so let's go with damn amazing.
[Nailed it.]
video;
video;
(no subject)
no subject
( she's from the past, what is technology? but she has had enlightening discussions about this exact thing. though it's helped there have still been points of confusion )
Would you be willing to answer a question?
( it's not just one )
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: kamen.rider
what if you're artificial but you were designed to function organically? where does that fall under?
[ he has a lot of questions, okay. ]
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[video]
video;
Re: video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
video;
Re: video;
video;
Re: video;
video; un: connor
But... by your definition, aren't you a droid right now? And an AI when you have no physical body? Or are droids designed to inhabit only one form?
video;
(no subject)
(no subject)
video; un: A2, shows up ten years late w/ starbux
video;
video;
video;
video;
Re: video;
video;
video;
video; unhackable and private.
video; same
video;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)