Audio; UN: GFID-13576

[chozobloodrites]

This roster. It seems other people have gotten it too. It's obviously evidence for what was happening here, but also a good suggestion.

They had a Chief of Security. Where I'm from, my job was to keep things secure and safe. So unless someone has reasonable objections to it, I'm going to continue that work here. Call me Chief of Security or not. I don't care.

I'm going to mark areas known to be dangerous, like the sinking doors. If there are any other locations you notice and are worried about let me know. And if anyone personally does anything harmful to another person then I will step in and stop it.

Comments

[chozobloodrites]

Is that not what I said?

[No Samus. No it is not at all.]

[counterfeitheart]

Nope.

Now, while I can see where you're coming from, you start with the 'Chief of Security' part, and then suggest 'unless someone has REASONABLE OBJECTIONS to it, I'm going to continue that work here'. The part where you dismiss the title comes after that, suggesting that it isn't really your intention to actually disregard such a thing.

'I will step in and stop it' sounds more like 'I presume to know the circumstances of any altercation by a look, and will enforce my view of right and wrong, despite the fact that my knowledge is limited and that morality is not black and white.'

You make a lot of declarations, leaving no room in your rigid speech patterns for others to object to your actions while proposing that you can object to others' actions. You see what I mean?

[chozobloodrites]

I put everything as simply as I can. There could be objections to what I say but they should be given in fact. Same as I will only object to others actions by fact.

That's how it should be done.

[counterfeitheart]

Hm hm hm. Not gonna go far with humans with that kind of attitude. Best be careful, or you'll be the one they're revolting against.

The fact is, that facts are not as easy to come by as you think. That's why people have courts of law in which a large group of people are convened in order to see evidence presented and hear testimonies in order to try to painstakingly scrape the facts from the fiction.

And even then, they are not always correct. I'd say your best bet is to stick to mapping out the station, and keep security otherwise to people with more flexible views.

[chozobloodrites]

Flexible views can allow for easy corruption. It's better left in the hands of someone who knows right and wrong.

[counterfeitheart]

I mean, I guess that's your view.

I await the impending chaos with bated breath.